Skip to content

    Supreme Court Issues Notice On MDMK Leader Vaiko's Plea Challenging Special Intensive Revision Of Electoral Rolls In Tamil Nadu

    Supreme Court Judgement

    1. Home
    2. /Supreme Court Judgement

    Supreme Court Issues Notice On MDMK Leader Vaiko's Plea Challenging Special Intensive Revision Of Electoral Rolls In Tamil Nadu

    Supreme Court issues notice on MDMK leader Vaiko's plea challenging the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Tamil Nadu. CJI Surya Kant's bench tags the matter with DMK's plea for hearing on December 2

    Tanzeel Sarwar
    Nov 25, 2025·3 min read
    Supreme Court Issues Notice On MDMK Leader Vaiko's Plea Challenging Special Intensive Revision Of Electoral Rolls In Tamil Nadu

    November 25, 2025

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice on a petition filed by Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK) founder Vaiko challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Tamil Nadu.

    A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi passed the order while tagging the matter with similar pending petitions.The Court has listed the case for further consideration on December 2, 2025.

    Background Of The Dispute

    The controversy arises from the Election Commission's notification mandating a Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Tamil Nadu. The petitioner contends that this special exercise, distinct from the regular summary revision, is being implemented arbitrarily.

    Advertisement

    Multiple political entities, including the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), the Communist Party of India (Marxist), and actor Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), have already moved the Top Court challenging the SIR. Conversely, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) has filed an application supporting the Election Commission's move.

    On November 11, the Supreme Court had previously sought the ECI’s response on the related pleas.

    Arguments Raised By The Petitioner

    Vaiko, a former Rajya Sabha MP, challenged the notification on the grounds that it violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Specifically, the plea alleges infringement of:

    1. Article 14 (Right to Equality)
    2. Article 19 (Freedom of Speech and Expression)
    3. Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty)


    The petition further argues that the SIR notification contravenes Articles 325 and 326 of the Constitution, which govern the preparation of electoral rolls and adult suffrage. Additionally, the plea asserts that the move is inconsistent with various provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.

    Court's Observations And Directions

    During the hearing, the Bench noted the existence of multiple petitions raising identical issues. To ensure uniformity in judicial adjudication, the Court directed that proceedings related to the Tamil Nadu SIR pending before various High Courts be kept in abeyance.

    The Bench ordered:

    "Issue notice. Tag with the pending matters. The High Courts are requested to keep the petitions filed in relation to the SIR of these states in abeyance."

    Procedural Next Steps

    The matter will be heard next on December 2, along with the connected petitions filed by the DMK and other parties. The Election Commission is expected to clarify its stance on the necessity of the special revision process in the state.

    Case Title: Vaiko v. Election Commission of India

    Case No: W.P.(C) No. 1099/2025



    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse Supreme Court Judgement

    More from this court

    • "Arrest and Remand Illegal If Written Grounds of Arrest Not Communicated at Least Two Hours Before Magistrate Appearance: SC"

      Supreme Court of India

    • Adani Enterprises Rs 126 Crore Arbitral Award Upheld By SC

      Supreme Court of India

    Related legal topics

    • Special Intensive Revision Must Be Transparent, SC Tells ECI

      Election Commission of India

    • Does ED Have Power For 'Further Investigation'? Supreme Court To Examine IAS Officer Saumya Chaurasia’s Plea Against 'Evergreen Custody'

      CJI Surya Kant

    • ECI to SC: Citizenship Check for Voter Rolls is a 'Soft Touch' Exercise, Not a Deportation Drive

      Election Commission of India

    • Supreme Court Declines Urgent Hearing on Plea to Stop PM's Chadar Offering at Ajmer Sharif

      CJI Surya Kant

    Advertisement

    Tanzeel Sarwar

    Cyber and AI Governance

    See more from Tanzeel →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer