Also Read - Brinda Karat Seeks Review of Supreme Court’s Clean Chit to Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma in Hate Speech Matter

The bail application was heard after the period of judicial custody. In granting bail, Judge KS Katkade noted the surety offered by the accused and took into account the health condition that had previously necessitated a virtual appearance. The court exercised its discretion under Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which governs bail in non‑bailable offences, and determined that the conditions imposed were sufficient to ensure the accused’s presence during trial while addressing the concerns raised by the prosecution.

The order, which is awaited in its detailed copy, specifies that the bail is conditional upon the furnishing of the surety and the accused’s cooperation with the investigation. The court directed that Mhatre shall not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses, and that he shall appear before the court as and when required.

Also Read - Madras High Court Clarifies That Repeated Physical Intimacy Does Not Amount to Consent; Courts Must Probe Coercion and Deception

Legal observers note that the decision reflects the balancing act courts undertake between the liberty of the accused and the interests of justice, particularly in cases attracting significant public attention. The imposition of a monetary surety, coupled with the requirement to attend all proceedings, aims to mitigate any risk of absconding while respecting the accused’s right to bail pending trial.

The case is titled Ramesh Ramchandra Mhatre versus State of Maharashtra. Further developments will depend on the completion of the investigation and the framing of charges by the prosecution. The matter remains sub judice, and any subsequent orders will be issued by the same Magistrate court in Kalyan.

Also Read - Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Child Rape Case