New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has sounded a major alarm over a sophisticated and "wide racket" involving fraudulent motor accident claims. The Court observed that insured vehicles are being strategically “planted” in accident scenes to siphon off compensation from insurance companies, potentially involving a nexus of multiple stakeholders.

A Bench comprising Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice Prasanna B. Varale expressed shock at the scale of the fraud, noting that the pattern of illegal activity might not be limited to a single state but could be a pan-India phenomenon.

The matter reached the apex court through a plea filed by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging a compensation award granted by the Orissa High Court. The insurance company raised a red flag, pointing out a startling coincidence: the specific vehicle involved in the claim had been cited as the "offending vehicle" in four other separate accident cases.

The insurer argued that because the vehicle carried valid insurance, it was being used as a "pawn" or "planted" in various claim petitions to ensure that compensation could be legally recovered from a deep-pocketed, solvent insurance company.

Taking the allegations seriously, the Supreme Court had previously ordered a deep-dive investigation by the Odisha State authorities. During the recent hearing, the Advocate General for Odisha submitted a compliance report that confirmed the insurer's suspicions.

The report revealed that the vehicle in question was indeed linked to a series of suspicious claims. The Advocate General informed the Bench that the ongoing probe indicates a "wide racket" where "all stakeholders may be involved"—a term often used in legal circles to imply a possible collusion between local authorities, medical professionals, and legal representatives.

Several arrests have already been made in Odisha, and the State has been granted liberty by the Court to conduct further custodial interrogations to get to the bottom of the conspiracy.

While the current case originated in Odisha, the Supreme Court noted the "enormity of the situation" and the "shocking facts" presented. Realizing that such organized fraud could be bleeding the insurance sector dry across the country, the Bench decided to broaden the scope of the proceedings.

In a significant move, the Court requested the counsel for the insurance company to provide a comprehensive list of all insurance companies operating in India across various sectors, including:

Vehicle Insurance
Medical and Life Insurance
Crop and Fire Insurance
Marine Insurance

The Bench indicated that it may consider framing nationwide guidelines or issuing systemic directions to prevent such "staged" claims in the future.

Fake MACT claims are not just a headache for insurance companies; they impact the general public. High rates of insurance fraud lead to increased premiums for honest vehicle owners. Furthermore, such rackets clog the judicial system, delaying genuine compensation for actual victims of road accidents who often wait years for relief.

The Court recorded its appreciation for the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. for bringing this larger issue to light and praised the Advocate General of Odisha for his proactive role in the investigation.

The Supreme Court has listed the matter for further directions on March 18, 2026. On this day, the Court is expected to review the list of insurance providers and may initiate a process to involve stakeholders from across the country to sanitize the motor accident claim process.

Case Title: The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tuni Pati & Ors.