In a significant move aimed at ensuring justice and immediate relief for acid attack survivors, the Supreme Court of India has directed all States and Union Territories (UTs) to release pending compensation funds by March 10, 2026. The Court's intervention comes after it was brought to light that many survivors, despite having their compensation applications approved, were left waiting for months because state governments had failed to release the necessary funds.

The order, passed by a bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, emphasizes that legal victories on paper are meaningless if they do not translate into tangible financial and medical support for those who have suffered life-altering injuries.

The Supreme Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Acid Survivors Saahas Foundation (NGO). The petition sought the strict implementation of guidelines previously laid down by the apex court in the landmark case of Laxmi v. Union of India.

During the proceedings, Advocate Rashmi Nandakumar, appearing for the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), pointed out a critical bottleneck in the system. While the District and State Legal Services Authorities (DLSAs/SLSAs) are responsible for verifying claims and approving compensation, the actual money often resides with the State Government's Social Welfare Departments.

The Court was informed that even when applications are cleared, the funds remain "stuck" at the government level.

"Wherever approval has been granted for payment of victim compensation to the victims of the acid attack and communication has been made... steps shall be taken for releasing the outstanding amounts to the victims whose applications have been cleared on or before 10th March 2026," the Court ordered.

Justice BV Nagarathna expressed concern over the current state of affairs, noting that allowing compensation applications without having the actual funds to pay them serves no real purpose. For a survivor who requires urgent surgeries, expensive medicines, and psychological rehabilitation, an "approved" application provides no relief if the bank account remains empty.

The Bench noted that while a consolidated budget is usually released to State Legal Services Authorities at the start of a financial year, these funds often dry up within the first few months. Subsequent applications are then sent to the state departments for individual disbursal, leading to bureaucratic delays and administrative red tape.

Key Directions Issued by the Court

To streamline the process and ensure accountability, the Supreme Court issued a set of clear mandates:

Strict Deadline: All States and Union Territories must release the outstanding amounts to approved victims by March 10, 2026.
Affidavit of Compliance: The Secretary of the State/Union Territory Social Welfare Department is required to file an affidavit. This document must detail the amounts already disbursed and the amounts pending for the current financial year (2025-26).
Expeditious Processing: NALSA has been requested to issue directions to all Member Secretaries of SLSAs (and through them to district and taluka authorities) to ensure that new applications are received and considered without delay.
Government Cooperation: The Court emphasized that the effectiveness of judicial orders depends entirely on the cooperation of the states.

One of the most distressing points raised during the hearing was the "secondary victimization" survivors face while applying for help. The counsel for the petitioner (the NGO) highlighted that many victims are being asked to produce specific court orders or First Information Reports (FIRs) before their compensation applications are even processed.

For many survivors, especially those in rural areas or those dealing with trauma, navigating the police system to get an FIR or going to a lower court just to trigger compensation is a massive hurdle. This requirement often discourages victims from seeking the help they are legally entitled to.

While NALSA stated it was not aware of a widespread practice of demanding FIRs for processing (as the schemes are meant to be victim-centric), they assured the Court they would look into specific instances of such hurdles. The Court’s direction to NALSA to issue "appropriate directions" for "expeditious consideration" is seen as a move to simplify these procedural requirements.

The current PIL seeks to build on the foundations laid in the 2014 Laxmi v. Union of India judgment. In that historic case, the Supreme Court had revolutionized the legal landscape for acid attack survivors by:

Mandating Compensation: Setting a minimum compensation of ₹3,00,000 for acid attack victims.
Free Treatment: Ruling that both public and private hospitals must provide free medical treatment, including specialized plastic surgeries and restorative procedures.
Regulating Acid Sales: Directing states to strictly regulate the over-the-counter sale of acid and corrosive substances.

The latest figures provided by NALSA show the scale of the issue: between April 2024 and March 2025, approximately ₹484 crore was disbursed to victims. However, as the current hearing revealed, the need remains vast, and the gap between "approval" and "payment" remains the biggest challenge.

The Supreme Court’s order is a stern reminder to the executive branch that victim compensation is not a matter of charity, but a legal right. By setting a hard deadline of March 10, the Court has put the onus squarely on State Social Welfare Departments.

As Justice Nagarathna observed, the hope is that these directions will provide "tangible relief" rather than just remaining as text in a law reporter. For hundreds of survivors across India waiting for surgeries and daily sustenance, the next few weeks will be crucial.

Case Details:

Case No: W.P.(C) No. 1252/2023
Case Title: Acid Survivors Saahas Foundation (NGO) v. Union of India
Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan