Skip to content

    "Fake Lawyer" Scam: SC Grants Bail to Woman Accused of Impersonating Supreme Court Advocate

    Supreme Court Judgement

    1. Home
    2. /Supreme Court Judgement

    "Fake Lawyer" Scam: SC Grants Bail to Woman Accused of Impersonating Supreme Court Advocate

    A new petition argues that the UGC's 2026 Regulations define "caste-based discrimination" too narrowly, leaving out students from non-reserved categories who might also face bias.

    Tanzeel Sarwar
    Feb 7, 2026·2 min read
    "Fake Lawyer" Scam: SC Grants Bail to Woman Accused of Impersonating Supreme Court Advocate

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday granted bail to Poonam Charandas Khanna, a 60-year-old woman accused of cheating multiple builders in Mumbai by falsely presenting herself as a practicing advocate in the Supreme Court.

    The Bench, comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, set aside the Bombay High Court's order refusing her bail. The Court noted that the accused had already spent nearly two years in custody and the trial was proceeding at a snail's pace.

    The case against Khanna is built on an FIR registered at Kherwadi Police Station, Mumbai, in 2020. The complainant, a builder named Ashok Govindram Mohnani, alleged that he was introduced to Khanna as a "Supreme Court lawyer" who could solve his legal troubles.

    1. Legal Fees: She allegedly demanded ₹15 lakh to handle two legal cases, receiving an advance of ₹10 lakh.
    2. The Big Con: The builders were facing issues with electricity connections for their construction sites. Khanna allegedly assured them she would file a petition to get transformers installed. For this, she demanded a whopping ₹3 crore, eventually signing an MoU for ₹2.11 crore.
    3. The Unraveling: After paying over ₹71 lakh in cash and transfers, the builders realized no petition was filed. Inquiries revealed she was not a qualified advocate at all.


    Appearing for Khanna, Advocate Prastut Mahesh Dalvi argued that she is a senior citizen who has been in custody since January 2024 (and previously). He highlighted that the maximum punishment for cheating (Section 420 IPC) is 7 years, yet the trial is nowhere near completion with only 8 out of 12 witnesses examined.

    Advertisement

    The Supreme Court accepted these contentions.

    "A case for grant of bail is made out, particularly in view of the prolonged incarceration and the nature of the offences."

    The Court directed her release subject to trial court conditions, warning that any misuse of liberty would lead to cancellation of bail.


    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse Supreme Court Judgement

    Related legal topics

    • Section 138 NI Act Case Can Be Settled, Supreme Court Says

      Supreme Court Judgement

    • Delayed Chargesheet Can Quash Criminal Case, Supreme Court Says

      Supreme Court Judgement

    • S Rajaseekaran Case 2025: Road Safety Rights Explained

      Supreme Court Judgement

    • Last Seen Theory In Criminal Cases: Supreme Court Explains

      Supreme Court Judgement

    • Gift Deed Can Be Cancelled If Children Neglect Parents: SC

      Supreme Court Judgement

    • "Arrest and Remand Illegal If Written Grounds of Arrest Not Communicated at Least Two Hours Before Magistrate Appearance: SC"

      Supreme Court Judgement

    Advertisement

    Tanzeel Sarwar

    Cyber and AI Governance

    See more from Tanzeel →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer