Also Read - MP High Court Permits Minor Girl to Reside with Father Amid POCSO Allegations

"Unfortunately, none of the 13 petitioners could impress us," the bench observed. Because the representative cases failed to meet the necessary legal threshold, the court determined that the entire batch of over 40 writ petitions was devoid of merit. Consequently, the claims of all remaining petitioners, not just those scrutinized in the sample, were dismissed.

This ruling underscores the court's commitment to procedural integrity. By refusing to regularize appointments that did not align with the established statutory requirements, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the necessity of following due process in public appointments, even within the context of minority-run educational institutions.

Also Read - Allahabad High Court Delivers Key Rulings on Habeas Corpus, Census Duties, and PIL Maintainability in June 2026

For the hundreds of staff members involved, this judgment marks the end of a difficult chapter. It serves as a stark reminder that while the law provides avenues for redress, success in such matters requires strict adherence to legislative norms and the ability to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief being sought. The decision effectively closes the door on a debate that has simmered in West Bengal’s educational sector for over a decade.