In a move underscoring the gravity of the Karur stampede case, the Supreme Court has recently doubled down on its commitment to an independent probe, directing the family of a deceased victim to approach the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) with serious allegations of political pressure and intimidation.

The immediate prompt for this directive came from S. Prabhakaran, who tragically lost both his sister and fiancée in the stampede. Through his advocate, Balaji Srinivasan, Prabhakaran made an urgent submission, alleging that he was being pressured by state police officers and "political secretaries" to withdraw his petitions from the apex court.

The bench of Justice J.K. Maheshwari responded immediately, essentially handing the issue directly to the federal agency. "Go to the CBI... Put it out to the CBI. The CBI will look into it," the bench stated, making it clear that the central agency now holds the responsibility for looking into every aspect of this case, including threats made against petitioners.

The Foundation of the CBI Probe

This latest order reaffirms the Supreme Court's earlier, decisive intervention that transferred the investigation entirely to the CBI. That initial decision was rooted in the principle that the incident, which claimed 41 lives during a rally for actor Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) party, had a "direct bearing on the fundamental rights of the citizens."

The top court felt that the investigation could not be left to the state police, especially due to the highly political nature of the tragedy. To safeguard the integrity of the process, the court had already set up a three-member monitoring committee, led by former Supreme Court judge Justice Ajay Rastogi, along with two non-native Tamil Nadu IPS officers. This committee is tasked with overseeing the CBI’s work, which must submit monthly progress reports.

The Political and Legal Showdown

The shift to the CBI was largely driven by a legal challenge filed by the TVK itself. The party had appealed against an earlier Madras High Court order that formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) composed entirely of state police officers.

The TVK argued that the High Court’s decision was self-defeating: how could the court express dissatisfaction with the independence of the state police and then appoint senior officers from the very same force to investigate? The party’s plea highlighted the prejudice and potential for bias in a state-led probe, especially given that top state officials had publicly defended the police’s actions during the rally.

Furthermore, TVK’s petition introduced a counter-narrative, suggesting the tragedy might have been the result of a "pre-planned conspiracy by miscreants" aimed at disrupting the rally. The party strongly contested the Madras High Court’s remarks blaming TVK leaders for "fleeing the scene," claiming their members actively provided medical aid to the victims.

Beyond the Probe: New Rules for Rallies

It is also noteworthy that the Madras High Court, while forming the now-suspended SIT, had passed a crucial directive: it banned political rallies, roadshows, and similar public events along highways until proper Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) could be framed. This separate instruction reflects a growing concern about the lack of safety protocols for massive political gatherings, a concern that remains active even as the criminal investigation moves forward under central scrutiny.

In essence, the Supreme Court is ensuring that the investigation into the Karur stampede is not only independent but also insulated from the pressures of power. By directing the victim's family to the CBI, the court has clearly empowered the central agency to address political intimidation, ensuring that the quest for accountability remains unimpeded.