Skip to content

    Supreme Court Declines Urgent Hearing on Plea to Stop PM's Chadar Offering at Ajmer Sharif

    News

    1. Home
    2. /News

    Supreme Court Declines Urgent Hearing on Plea to Stop PM's Chadar Offering at Ajmer Sharif

    The Supreme Court declined the request for an urgent hearing on a plea aimed at restraining the Prime Minister from presenting a ceremonial chadar at the Ajmer Sharif Dargah.

    Tanzeel Sarwar
    Dec 22, 2025·2 min read
    Supreme Court Declines Urgent Hearing on Plea to Stop PM's Chadar Offering at Ajmer Sharif

    The Supreme Court of India refused to urgently list a petition seeking to stop Prime Minister Narendra Modi from offering a ceremonial 'chadar' at the Ajmer Sharif Dargah.

    The Issue:

    1. The Petition: A plea was filed asking the Court to restrain the Prime Minister from offering a chadar at the tomb of Sufi Saint Khwaja Moinuddin Hasan Chisti during the annual Urs festival.
    2. The Argument: The petitioner's lawyer argued that there is a pending legal dispute regarding a "Sankat Mochan Mandir" at the site. They claimed that the government offering a chadar at a "disputed structure" could undermine the judicial process while the case is still being decided.
    3. Context: It was reported that Union Minister Kiren Rijiju was scheduled to offer the chadar on behalf of the Prime Minister, a tradition followed by past PMs as well.

    What Happened in Court:

    1. The lawyer requested an urgent hearing before a vacation bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
    2. The Decision: CJI Surya Kant declined the request, stating simply, "No listing today."

    Legal Background:

    Advertisement

    This isn't the first time this issue has been raised. A similar plea was filed earlier in an Ajmer court by the Hindu Sena, alleging that the Dargah was built over a demolished Shiva temple. That suit is currently pending. The current petition before the Supreme Court appears to be connected to these ongoing claims about the site's history and religious status.


    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse News

    More from this court

    • "Arrest and Remand Illegal If Written Grounds of Arrest Not Communicated at Least Two Hours Before Magistrate Appearance: SC"

      Supreme Court of India

    • Adani Enterprises Rs 126 Crore Arbitral Award Upheld By SC

      Supreme Court of India

    Statutes and provisions

    • Right To Associate With Political Parties Protected Under Article 21: Delhi High Court

      Constitution of India

    • Supreme Court Rules Single Tainted Tender Violates Article 14

      Constitution of India

    Related legal topics

    • Landmark Decision: Allahabad HC Rules Marriage With 16-Year-Old 'Not Void' Under Muslim Law

      Law News

    • Does ED Have Power For 'Further Investigation'? Supreme Court To Examine IAS Officer Saumya Chaurasia’s Plea Against 'Evergreen Custody'

      CJI Surya Kant

    Advertisement

    Tanzeel Sarwar

    Cyber and AI Governance

    See more from Tanzeel →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer