The Supreme Court of India has come down heavily on the Uttar Pradesh Police and local medical authorities for their "lethargic" and "shoddy" investigation into the brutal rape and murder of a four-year-old girl in Ghaziabad. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed deep anguish over the series of procedural lapses that occurred from the moment the child was reported missing to the conduct of the post-mortem, noting that such failures are "fatal to the cause of justice."
​The Court specifically flagged the "indifference" of the police, who failed to secure the crime scene or collect vital forensic evidence in a timely manner. The bench was particularly appalled by the fact that the post-mortem was conducted in a "casual and perfunctory" manner. It was revealed that the doctors failed to preserve essential biological samples, which is a mandatory requirement under the POCSO Act and standard criminal procedure for sexual assault cases. The Court remarked that these lapses seemed almost intentional, aimed at weakening the prosecution's case.
​Beyond the police, the conduct of the hospital came under severe scrutiny. The Supreme Court noted that the medical report was riddled with inconsistencies and lacked the detailed observations necessary for a case of such gravity. The bench observed that the medical professionals involved appeared to have ignored the "SOPs" (Standard Operating Procedures) laid down for examining victims of sexual violence, effectively "burying the truth" along with the victim.
​In a significant move to ensure accountability, the Supreme Court has:
- ​Ordered a High-Level SIT: Directed the formation of a Special Investigation Team headed by an officer not below the rank of Inspector General (IG) to conduct a fresh probe.
- ​Medical Oversight: Suggested that the state government take disciplinary action against the doctors who conducted the faulty post-mortem.
- ​DGP Monitoring: Ordered the Director General of Police, UP, to personally monitor the case to ensure no further local interference.
​The bench emphasized that in cases involving the most vulnerable members of society, the State holds a "sacrosanct duty" to provide a fair and rigorous investigation. The Court warned that if the machinery of the State—the police and the medical system—colludes or remains indifferent, the "rule of law" becomes a casualty. The SIT has been given a strict timeline to submit its report, as the Court intends to keep a close watch on the proceedings to prevent any further miscarriage of justice.