Skip to content

    SC Plea Against PM Modi's DD Speech for Alleged MCC Violation

    SC News

    1. Home
    2. /SC News

    SC Plea Against PM Modi's DD Speech for Alleged MCC Violation

    A Congress MP has moved the Supreme Court alleging that PM Narendra Modi’s speech on Doordarshan violates the Model Code of Conduct.

    Hydar Choudhury
    Apr 22, 2026·2 min read
    SC Plea Against PM Modi's DD Speech for Alleged MCC Violation

    A Congress Member of Parliament has approached the Supreme Court of India alleging a violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The petition centers on a recent speech delivered by the Prime Minister that was broadcast live on the national carrier, Doordarshan (DD), during the ongoing election period.

    ​The petitioner argues that the broadcast constitutes a misuse of government machinery and state resources for electoral campaigning. According to the plea, the "level playing field" essential for a fair democracy is compromised when the ruling party utilizes public broadcasters to disseminate political messaging to a massive audience, a privilege not equally afforded to opposition parties under similar circumstances.

    ​The petition further alleges that the content of the speech contained divisive rhetoric that contravenes the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) guidelines, which prohibit appeals to caste or communal feelings for securing votes. The MP’s legal team stated that they had previously filed a representation with the Election Commission, but the lack of "immediate and decisive action" necessitated the intervention of the apex court.

    ​Counsel for the petitioner has requested an urgent listing of the matter, seeking a directive for the ECI to take coercive action and for a restraint on Doordarshan from broadcasting such political content during the MCC period. The petition emphasizes that the ECI’s constitutional mandate under Article 324 is to ensure that no candidate or party gains an unfair advantage through the use of state-controlled media.

    Advertisement

    ​The Union Government and the Election Commission are expected to defend the broadcast, potentially arguing that the speech was part of official duties or an informative address to the nation rather than an election campaign event. The Supreme Court's decision on whether to intervene will be a significant indicator of the judiciary's role in supervising electoral conduct and the neutrality of state-owned media during polls.

    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse SC News

    Related legal topics

    • Non-Parties Beware: Supreme Court Rules Third Parties Liable for Contempt if They Knowingly Aid Disobedience of Orders

      SC News

    • Revenue Records Don't Confer Title: Supreme Court Summarizes Key Principles on Land Ownership and Revenue Entries

      SC News

    • Supreme Court Flags Pan-India Racket of ‘Planted’ Vehicles in Fake Insurance Claims; Calls for Nationwide Scrutiny

      SC News

    • "Black Sheep" In Legal Profession Must Be Dealt With Immediately: Supreme Court Questions Bar Council’s Disciplinary Mechanism

      SC News

    • Supreme Court: Judgments Must Address All Issues, Not Just One Winning Point

      SC News

    • Silence is Not Non-Cooperation: Supreme Court Rules Accused Not Obliged to Answer Every Question to Secure Bail

      SC News

    Advertisement

    Hydar Choudhury

    See more from Hydar →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer