The Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Police Service (DANIPS) and the Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Civil Service (DANICS) are central civil services whose officers are recruited through a combined competitive examination. The service rules governing these cadres do not expressly specify a cutoff date for determining the period of ‘approved service’ that counts towards promotion, seniority and other service benefits. In the absence of such a provision, differing interpretations have arisen among the appointing authorities, leading to inconsistencies in the calculation of service length for officers who cleared the examination in different years.

Aggrieved by the lack of uniformity, a batch of officers approached the Delhi High Court seeking clarification on the date that should be reckoned as the approved service point for the purpose of career progression. The petitioners contended that the prevailing practice, which varied from office to office, violated the principle of equal treatment and created legitimate expectations that were not being honoured.

After hearing the submissions, the Division Bench comprising Justice Anil Kshetrapal and Justice Amit Mahajan noted that the existing recruitment and service regulations for DANIPS and DANICS are silent on the precise moment at which the period of approved service commences. The Bench observed that this lacuna has resulted in arbitrary application, with some treating the date of issuance of the appointment order as the reckoning point, while others consider the date of joining training or the date of declaration of examination results.

The Court emphasized that service matters require certainty and predictability, especially when they affect promotion avenues and pensionary benefits. It held that, in the absence of an express rule, a uniform cutoff date must be adopted to prevent disparate treatment and to uphold the doctrine of legitimate expectation. The Bench further stated that adopting 1 January of 1 January following the year of examination aligns with the academic calendar and the typical timing of the final selection process, thereby providing a neutral and easily ascertainable reference point.

The Bench clarified that this direction is strictly interim and is intended to operate only until the competent authority frames fresh rules that expressly deal with the determination of approved service. It directed the Ministry of Home Affairs, which is the cadre controlling authority for DANIPS and DANICS, to consider the issue and notify appropriate amendments within a reasonable period. The Court also made it clear that the interim date shall not prejudice any rights that may be conferred under the forthcoming rules.