The UAE’s refusal to participate in any post-war plan that serves as "cover" for the Israeli military presence underscores a principled stance. Emirati officials have been clear that their involvement in Gaza’s reconstruction or governance is contingent upon the establishment of a legitimate Palestinian government. They seek a leadership that reflects the aspirations of the Palestinian people rather than one imposed by outside forces.

This diplomatic standoff reveals the limitations of the Abraham Accords in the face of the ongoing conflict. While the accords opened doors for economic and technological cooperation, the political reality of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict remains a formidable barrier. The UAE is increasingly cautious about being seen as a partner in policies that do not lead to a sustainable two-state solution or genuine Palestinian sovereignty.

Observers suggest that Netanyahu’s claims may be aimed more at a domestic audience, attempting to project an image of regional acceptance and diplomatic success. Conversely, the UAE’s firm pushback serves as a reminder that Gulf support is not a blank check. For Abu Dhabi, the priority remains regional stability, which they believe cannot be achieved without addressing the core issues of Palestinian governance and Israeli occupation.

As the situation evolves, the relationship between Israel and the UAE appears to be entering a more transactional and scrutinized phase. The public denial of the "secret visit" serves as a definitive boundary-setting exercise by the UAE. It remains to be seen whether this friction will lead to a temporary cooling of ties or a more profound shift in how the two nations navigate the complex geopolitical challenges of the Middle East.