The Madras High Court, sitting at its Madurai Bench, dismissed the appeal filed by a man who had been convicted of sexual assault by intimidation through the use of intimate images. The bench, comprising Justice Anand Venkatesh and Justice KK Ramakrishnan, affirmed the conviction after reviewing the record and the arguments presented by the appellant.

The court noted that the offence involved the accused obtaining private photographs or videos of the complainant and then threatening to disseminate them unless certain demands were met. The trial court had found that such conduct amounted to sexual assault coupled with criminal intimidation, and had imposed a sentence accordingly. The appellate under the relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code.

In its judgment, the Madras High Court emphasized the broader societal impact of the offence. The bench observed that the non‑consensual circulation of intimate images poses a serious threat to the dignity and safety of individuals, particularly young women who may be persuaded to share such material in the context of a relationship. The court expressed concern that the ease of digital transmission amplifies the potential for harm.

Considering the public importance of the issue, the bench issued a direct appeal to young women, urging them not to share their intimate photographs or videos online, irrespective of the perceived depth of affection or trust in a relationship. The appeal was formulated in three languages—English, Hindi and Tamil—to ensure comprehension across different linguistic groups within the state.

The court clarified that its advisory was not a legal directive but a preventive measure intended to raise awareness about the risks associated with sharing private visual content. The bench stressed that once an image is uploaded or transmitted, control over its further dissemination is effectively lost, and the victim may face exploitation, humiliation, or blackmail.

The judgment also highlighted the responsibility of intermediaries and platform providers to act swiftly upon receiving complaints of non‑consensual intimate image sharing. While the immediate case concerned the appellant’s conviction, the court indicated that effective enforcement of existing legal provisions, coupled with proactive awareness campaigns, is essential to curb the growing menace of image‑based sexual abuse.

By dismissing the appeal, the Madras High Court upheld the trial court’s finding of guilt and the consequent sentence. The bench’s accompanying appeal in multiple languages serves as a supplementary effort to address the underlying social behaviour that facilitates such offences. The decision underscores the judiciary’s role in not only adjudicating individual cases but also issuing guidance aimed at preventing future harm.