In a significant move that could fundamentally change how dowry-related crimes are reported and prosecuted in India, the Kerala government has informed the Kerala High Court that it is considering a proposal to decriminalize the act of "giving dowry."

This proposal, drafted by the Kerala Law Reforms Commission, seeks to amend the decades-old Dowry Prohibition Act of 1961. The core idea is simple but revolutionary: if parents who are forced to give dowry are no longer treated as criminals, they will be more likely to come forward and report the "takers" without the fear of being jailed themselves.

The submissions were made on January 21, 2025, before a division bench comprising Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. The court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Tellmy Jolly, a law graduate and public policy professional.

The petitioner argued that the current law is self-defeating. Under Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, both the person giving dowry and the person taking it are liable for punishment. Jolly pointed out that this "equal blame" policy often silences victims. Families who have already been drained financially by dowry demands are terrified to complain to the police because, legally speaking, they are also "confessing" to a crime.

The State Government, represented by the government pleader, informed the bench that the Law Reforms Commission has recognized this "legal paradox." By removing the threat of prosecution for the "giver," the state aims to turn coerced parents and brides from "accomplices" into "witnesses" and "victims."

One of the most important parts of the proposed Dowry Prohibition (Kerala Amendment) Bill, 2025, is the new definition of dowry.

Currently, the 1961 Act defines dowry broadly as any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given by one party to another. The new draft bill proposes to redefine it as:

"Property or valuable security taken or demanded by the bridegroom or his relatives from the bride or her family."

Why does this matter? By changing the wording from "given" to "taken or demanded," the law shifts the entire criminal burden onto the groom’s side. The draft bill also proposes strict imprisonment for those who demand or take dowry.

The government pleader explained that the primary goal is to encourage reporting. In many cases, especially in states like Kerala where social status is closely tied to marriage rituals, families feel pressured to meet dowry demands. When the marriage turns abusive later, these families hesitate to seek legal help because they fear Section 3 of the Act.

The Law Reforms Commission noted that it is "unrealistic" to expect a bride’s parents to lodge a complaint when the law views them as criminals. By decriminalizing the act of giving, the state effectively offers "prosecutorial immunity" to the victim's family, making it safer for them to approach the Dowry Prohibition Officers or use the state’s new Dowry Prohibition Portal.

While the bill is soft on the givers, it is much tougher on the takers. Here are some key highlights of the proposed changes:

Increased Jail Time: The draft proposes that anyone taking or abetting the taking of dowry should face imprisonment for a term between 3 to 7 years, along with a fine of at least ₹50,000.
New Section 4A (Post-Marital Cruelty): The bill introduces a specific provision to punish husbands or relatives who subject a woman to physical or mental cruelty or refuse to maintain her due to non-payment of dowry after marriage. This would carry a punishment of up to 2 years in prison.
Compensation for Victims: Any fine recovered from the accused would be paid directly to the victim or her legal heirs as compensation.
Affidavits at Marriage: The proposal also includes a requirement for parents of both the bride and groom to file affidavits with the Marriage Registrar stating that no dowry was exchanged.

The Kerala High Court has taken serious note of these submissions. Recognizing that the Dowry Prohibition Act is a Central (Union) law, the bench has issued a notice to the Union of India, asking the Central Government to clarify its stand on these proposed state-level amendments.

Earlier, the State had also informed the court that it has already launched a dedicated portal to make it easier for the public to file complaints. The matter is now set for further consideration on February 11, 2025.

For decades, the "war on dowry" has been fought with a law that many believe punishes the wrong people. If Kerala successfully implements this amendment, it could set a precedent for the rest of India.

By recognizing that giving dowry is often an act of desperation rather than a choice, the law might finally start protecting the people it was meant to save. However, the final word lies with the Union Government and the Courts, who must decide if this "radical" shift is the solution India’s daughters have been waiting for.

Case Details:

Case Title: Tellmy Jolly v Union of India and Ors.
Case No: WP(PIL) 91/ 2025
Counsel for Petitioner: Kaleeswaram Raj, Thulasi K Raj, Aparna Narayan Menon
Counsel for Respondents: K Arjun Venugopal, O M Shalina (DSGI)