Skip to content

    Supreme Court Stays Gujarat High Court Proceedings on Deepfake and AI-Generated Content

    SC News

    1. Home
    2. /SC News

    Supreme Court Stays Gujarat High Court Proceedings on Deepfake and AI-Generated Content

    The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings before the Gujarat High Court in a public interest litigation concerning the regulation of deepfake and AI-generated content, while issuing notice on the Union government’s plea to transfer the case to the apex court.

    Hydar Choudhury
    Sep 12, 2026·3 min read
    Supreme Court Stays Gujarat High Court Proceedings on Deepfake and AI-Generated Content

    This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by the Jurisight Desk.

    The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings before the Gujarat High Court in a public interest litigation raising concerns about the rise in deepfake and AI-generated content circulating on digital and social media platforms. A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V Mohana passed the order while issuing notice on the Union of India’s plea seeking transfer of the case to the Supreme Court.

    The petition, titled Union of India v. Vikas Vijay Nair and Ors. (T.P.(C) No. 002597/2026), was filed as a public interest litigation highlighting the unchecked spread of synthetic media capable of destabilizing public order or undermining democratic institutions. The Gujarat High Court had, in April, issued notices to social media intermediaries including X (formerly Twitter), Meta, Google, and Reddit, directing them to respond to affidavits filed by the State and Central governments regarding compliance with the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, as amended by the Amendment Rules,

    During the hearing, Advocate Zoheb Hossain, appearing for the petitioners, informed the Court that similar proceedings had been interdicted before other High Courts and were now pending before the Supreme Court, underscoring the need for centralized adjudication.

    The Gujarat High Court, in its earlier order, had emphasized that the core issue pertained to the strict enforcement and uniform implementation of the existing statutory framework in the larger public interest. It had directed intermediaries to ensure swift action or response to statutory notices issued under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, to comply with time-bound takedown obligations under the IT Rules.

    Advertisement

    The State Government, in its affidavit, had suggested framing a policy mandating a robust regulatory framework with an immediate coordination mechanism between investigating authorities and digital service providers. It clarified that the objective was not to restrict legitimate expression but to prevent misuse of digital platforms for creating and disseminating unlawful content capable of threatening public order or democratic processes.

    The Union Government submitted that it had developed the SAHYOG Portal for routing intimations under Section 79(3)(b) read with Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules. The portal has been operational since October 2024 and facilitates immediate, coordinated, and time-bound action by bringing authorized law enforcement agencies and intermediaries on a single platform. It enables swift takedown of unlawful synthetically generated information and access to subscriber information, logs, and judicial evidence for identifying offending users.

    The Supreme Court’s stay of the Gujarat High Court proceedings, coupled with the issuance of notice on the transfer plea, indicates that the apex court is examining whether the matter warrants centralized hearing given the pan-India implications of regulating deepfake and AI-generated content across multiple jurisdictions.

    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse SC News

    More from this court

    • Appellate Courts Can Grant Interim Relief Even If Suit Is Dismissed By Trial Court: Supreme Court

      Supreme court

    • Delayed Chargesheet Can Quash Criminal Case, Supreme Court Says

      Supreme court

    • Last Seen Theory In Criminal Cases: Supreme Court Explains

      Supreme court

    Statutes and provisions

    • Digital Democracy: SC Seeks Union's Response on AAP's Social Media Suspension

      IT Rules 2021

    Related legal topics

    • Delhi High Court Grants Interim Relief to Actor Ravi Kishan on Personality Rights

      AI‑Generated Content

    • SC Declines Probe into CLAT 2026 Paper Leak Allegations, Cites Delay in Filing

      Public Interest Litigation

    Advertisement

    Hydar Choudhury

    See more from Hydar →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer