Skip to content

    P&H High Court Grants Interim Bail After Observing Manipulation of Medical Record in Attempt to Murder Case

    HC News

    1. Home
    2. /HC News

    P&H High Court Grants Interim Bail After Observing Manipulation of Medical Record in Attempt to Murder Case

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim bail to the accused after finding that the medical opinion used to upgrade charges to attempt to murder appears to have been manipulated by the treating doctor, directing the production of the doctor and complete hospital records.

    Hydar Choudhury
    Aug 28, 2026·3 min read
    P&H High Court Grants Interim Bail After Observing Manipulation of Medical Record in Attempt to Murder Case

    This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by the Jurisight Desk.

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim bail to a man accused of attempt to murder and other offences after observing that the medical opinion relied upon to add the more serious charge against him appears to have been manipulated by the doctor who furnished it.

    The Court, comprising Justice N.S. Shekhawat, noted that from the report prepared by the Medical Officer of Aarogyam Hospital, Kurukshetra, it is apparent that the medical record in the present case as well as the opinion has been manipulated by the said doctor, who had given the opinion in the present case.

    The FIR was registered under Sections 190, 191(3), 126, 324(5), 333, 351(3), 115 and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, corresponding to Sections 149, 148, 341, 426, 427, 453, 506, 323, 307 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution, a rukka was received on 02 January 2026 regarding the admission of the complainant, Pankaj, at LNJP Hospital, Kurukshetra, following an alleged assault while he had gone out on bank work. When police reached the hospital, they were informed the complainant had already left. He later appeared before the police himself and gave his account.

    The Medico-Legal Report obtained from Government Hospital, Kurukshetra recorded several complaints — headache, chest pain, pain in the right shoulder, abdominal pain, backache — but noted 'no external mark of fresh injury' for each, with only a 2x2 cm abrasion on the right knee found on examination, and referrals made for CT, X-ray, ultrasound and orthopaedic opinions.

    Advertisement

    It subsequently emerged that the complainant had been admitted to Shri Balaji Aarogyam Hospital, Kurukshetra. On an application moved by the police on 04 February 2026, the Medical Officer of that hospital gave an opinion that the complainant had presented with an alleged history of physical assault, that examination showed reduced air entry on the right side of the chest confirmed by HRCT as a right-sided pneumothorax, that an intercostal tube thoracostomy had been performed, and that the injury was 'dangerous to life' without surgical intervention.

    On the strength of this opinion, the police added Section 109(1) BNS, corresponding to Section 307 IPC, attempt to murder, to the case. Examining this sequence, the Court observed that 'it is apparent that the medical record in the present case as well as the opinion has been manipulated by the said doctor, who had given the opinion in the present case.'

    Rather than proceeding further against the doctor at this stage, the Court directed the Station House Officer, Police Station Krishna Gate, Thanesar, to produce the doctor before the Court on the next date of hearing, along with the complete medical record of Aarogyam Hospital, Kurukshetra. The matter was adjourned to 01 September 2026.

    The petitioner, who has been in custody since 04 January 2026, was ordered to be released on interim bail in the meantime, subject to furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court, Duty Magistrate, or Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

    The case is titled Pardeep Kumar @ Pankaj v. State of Haryana. Appearances were made by Mr. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Senior DAG, Haryana.

    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse HC News

    More from this court

    • From Courtroom to Credibility: Punjab & Haryana High Court Faces Scrutiny Over Senior Advocate Designations

      Punjab Haryana High Court

    • Punjab & Haryana High Court: "Wake Up Before You Retire" – Why Belated Pay Fixation Claims Can't Be Revived Years After Retirement

      Punjab Haryana High Court

    • Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Relief to YouTuber Rattandeep Singh Dhaliwal Challenging AAP MLAs' Complaints

      Punjab Haryana High Court

    • P&H High Court Expresses Concern Over Senior Advocate’s Remarks During Anticipatory Bail Hearing

      Punjab Haryana High Court

    Related legal topics

    • "Bail is Not a Recovery Tool": SC Rules Bail Hearings Can't Be Deferred Over Unpaid Dues

      Interim Bail

    • BNSS Section 187: Interim Bail Excluded From Police Remand

      Interim Bail

    Advertisement

    Hydar Choudhury

    See more from Hydar →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer