Also Read - MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Three Accused of Providing Equipment for Advertising Religious Conversion

The complainant stated that the applicant threatened to publish false and derogatory material about her on Facebook if the demand was not met.

The complainant alleged that on 11 December 2025 a news item containing allegations against her was uploaded on the Facebook account of the applicant and a second post appeared on 13 December 2025 showing her residence.

Also Read - Department Of Education Cannot Impose Recruitment Restrictions On Aided Minority Schools: Delhi High Court

The complainant added that the posts also claimed that the arrival of the Economic Offence Wing had caused a commotion at her residence and that multiple similar pieces were published by the applicant.

When confronted with the alleged fake news the complainant said the applicant increased his demand to one crore rupees and warned that continued publication of defamatory content would follow if the amount was not paid.

Also Read - Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Co‑operative Housing Society Managing Committee Members

The complainant further stated that after she warned of initiating legal proceedings for harassment the applicant replied that he would implicate her and her family under a false case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Based on the written complaint of the Assistant Commissioner of GST the police registered an FIR.

Also Read - J&K&L High Court Directs JMC to Survey Hotels, Coaching Centres and Commercial Establishments for Building and Fire Safety Violations

The defence counsel argued that there was no independent and cogent material on record to substantiate the alleged offences and that the applicant had been falsely implicated.

The counsel for the State opposed the anticipatory bail application submitting that the allegations were serious and warranted denial of bail.

Also Read - Patna High Court Dismisses PIL Against Award of Pirpainti Thermal Power Project to Adani Group

Justice Ratnesh Kumar Gupta observed that the allegations against the applicant were serious in nature.

The bench noted that the prosecution case revealed that the applicant not only attempted to get his work done on the basis of lacking documents but also tried to intimidate a public servant by maligning her dignity through unwanted news posted on various social media platforms.

Also Read - Patna High Court Upholds Independent Judgment Requirement for Disciplinary Authority

The court added that perusal of the case diary showed WhatsApp chats indicating ingredients of threat and unlawful gain from the complainant.

Having considered the submissions of both sides the bench concluded that the allegations were sufficiently grave to deny anticipatory bail.

Also Read - Jharkhand High Court Clarifies Scope of Bhang Under NDPS Act

The anticipatory bail application of Pradeep Kumar Jatav was therefore dismissed.