Also Read - Madras High Court Circular on Singing Vande Mataram Draws Concern Over Exclusion of Tamil Thai Vaazhthu

While closing the plea after taking note of the agreement to conduct the rally at an alternative location designated by the District Collector for public meetings involving more than 5,000 participants, the court added that in future, the police should not make citizens approach the court just for paying homage to the country and its flag.

The court expressed the hope that in future, the police would ensure that people are not made to approach the court for paying homage to their nation and its flag.

Also Read - Conviction Upheld but Sentence Set Aside Where Juvenile Tried as Adult: Supreme Court

When the State argued that permission was denied considering the law and order situation and the inconvenience that may be caused to residents of the area, the court remarked that such citizens should be reminded that the right to reside also exists because of the flag.

The court said it found it amusing that the State believed a group gathering to pay homage to the nation and its flag might cause inconvenience to some people, and suggested that the police could remind those who might be inconvenienced that their right to reside exists because of the flag.

Also Read - J&K&L High Court Rules National Sports Federation Cannot Compel Government Employee Relief for Sporting Assignments

During the hearing, the court criticised the State for refusing permission for a procession carrying the national flag and orally remarked that Coimbatore was the land of Tiruppur Kumaran, a freedom fighter who died holding the Indian flag while protesting against British rule.

The court said it was sad to see the State refuse permission to a party to carry the national flag in such a place, and remarked that police saying the Indian flag should not be carried was troubling, noting that without the flag, one would not have their rights.

Also Read - US Court Dismisses Criminal Case Against Gautam Adani Following Justice Department's Decision to Drop Prosecution

The Bench added orally that even in Kashmir, where there were protests, people were carrying flags, and suggested that if the officer wished to declare that Coimbatore was not part of India, they should declare it part of Pakistan or Afghanistan and that carrying a flag is a sin.

The court stressed that irrespective of political colour, citizens should be proud of the flag.

Also Read - Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Third Petition on Regulation of Religious Education

Pointing to a recent case where the State had denied permission for a bike rally by the Dravidar Kazhagam party, the court orally questioned whether the State was permitting rallies only by the ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam party and denying permission to other parties like Dravidar Kazhagam and the BJP.

The court asked whether the DK party should not do a rally, the BJP should not carry flags, so only TVK should be allowed to rally.

Also Read - Advocates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within 2 Years Of Provisional Enrolment Cannot Continue To Practise: Allahabad High Court

To this, the Assistant Public Prosecutor Arun Anbumani responded that the State was not taking sides.

The court had earlier noted that the BJP had argued the proposed yatra was a peaceful patriotic programme intended to promote national pride, nationalism, respect for the national flag, and to honour the sacrifice of freedom fighters and members of the armed forces.

Also Read - Delhi Court Acquits Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and Vinod Tomar in Wrestlers’ Sexual Harassment Case