Madras HC Directs Passport Office to Process AG Perarivalan Application Within Four Weeks

HC News

Madras HC Directs Passport Office to Process AG Perarivalan Application Within Four Weeks

Justice PT Asha rules that delay in issuing passport solely due to pending police report is impermissible after Supreme Court ordered convict's release.

Hydar Choudhury
3 min read
Madras HC Directs Passport Office to Process AG Perarivalan Application Within Four Weeks — HC News Legal Analysis | Jurisight
This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by the Jurisight Desk.

The Madras High Court has directed the Regional Passport Office, Chennai, to process the passport application of A.G. Perarivalan, a convict in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, within four weeks. Justice P.T. Asha issued the directive while allowing a writ petition filed by Perarivalan, who submitted that his application had been pending for over two years despite his release pursuant to a Supreme Court order.

What Did the Madras High Court Rule on the Passport Application Delay?

The court held that the Passport Authority cannot keep an application pending indefinitely solely because a police verification report is awaited, especially when the petitioner has been set at liberty by the Supreme Court and no criminal case is pending against him.

Background of the Petition

Perarivalan filed the petition seeking a direction to the authorities to dispose of his passport application filed under the Normal Scheme on May 6, 2024. He stated that he appeared for the scheduled appointment at the Passport Seva Kendra on October 21, 2024, where his application was registered and placed on hold pending police verification. He contended that despite cooperating fully and completing all formalities, the unexplained inaction caused him hardship and delayed his plans to pursue higher studies abroad.

Court Observations on Pending Criminal Proceedings

Justice Asha noted that although Perarivalan was originally convicted and sentenced by the Supreme Court, he was subsequently set at liberty by the same court. The judge observed that there was no criminal case pending against the petitioner at present. In these circumstances, the court found the reluctance of the Passport Authority to process the application solely on the ground of awaiting a police department report to be legally untenable.

Disposal and Directions Issued

The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent, the Passport Officer, to dispose of the application bearing File No. MA3067042901524. The court directed the authority to consider the counter affidavit filed by the Inspector of Police, Jolarpettai Police Station, Tirupathur District, as the police verification report. The entire exercise was ordered to be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

Comparison of Petitioner Status and Passport Authority Stance

Aspect

Petitioner Submission

Authority Stance / Court Finding

Conviction Status

Released by Supreme Court

No criminal case currently pending

Application Date

May 6, 2024

Pending over two years

Reason for Delay

Police verification awaited

Court: Not a valid ground for refusal

Relief Granted

Mandamus to process in 4 weeks

Counter affidavit deemed as verification

The matter was argued by Ms. R.A. Parkavi for the petitioner, while Mr. U.M. Shankaar, Central Government Standing Counsel, and Mr. Durai Gunasekaran, Government Advocate (Criminal Side), appeared for the respondents.

Hydar Choudhury

More stories by Hydar