Skip to content

    Delhi HC Refuses to Stay Trial in CM Rekha Gupta Assault Case

    HC News

    1. Home
    2. /HC News

    Delhi HC Refuses to Stay Trial in CM Rekha Gupta Assault Case

    The Delhi High Court declined to halt the trial against men accused of assaulting CM Rekha Gupta, stating that the trial is at an advanced stage

    Jurisight
    Apr 16, 2026·2 min read
    Delhi HC Refuses to Stay Trial in CM Rekha Gupta Assault Case

    The Delhi High Court has refused to stay the trial against several individuals accused of assaulting Chief Minister Rekha Gupta during a public event in 2024. A single-judge Bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani observed that the trial has already reached an advanced stage and that stalling the proceedings at this juncture would not serve the interests of justice. The Court emphasized that the accused will have a full opportunity to present their defense before the trial court.

    ​The case involves an incident where the Chief Minister was allegedly heckled and physically assaulted by a group of protesters during a ribbon-cutting ceremony in North Delhi. The Delhi Police filed a chargesheet naming several local activists and political workers, accusing them of criminal conspiracy, assault on a public servant, and rioting. The petitioners had approached the High Court seeking a stay, claiming that the FIR was "politically motivated" and that the evidence against them was purely circumstantial.

    ​Justice Bhambhani noted that the "power to stay a criminal trial is an extraordinary one" and should be exercised sparingly. The Court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any "manifest injustice" or procedural illegality that would warrant halting the trial. The Bench also remarked that the Chief Minister, as a public servant, is entitled to a speedy conclusion of the case, just as the accused are entitled to a fair trial.

    ​The petitioners argued that the police had relied on "doctored" video footage and that they were merely exercising their democratic right to protest. However, the High Court held that the authenticity of the video evidence is a matter of trial and cannot be adjudicated upon in a writ petition. The Court directed the trial court to continue the proceedings on a day-to-day basis to ensure a timely verdict.

    Advertisement

    ​This ruling underscores the judiciary's reluctance to interfere in the trial process once charges have been framed and evidence recording has commenced. With the High Court’s refusal to intervene, the special court for MPs/MLAs is expected to proceed with the cross-examination of key eyewitnesses, including security personnel who were present at the scene. The outcome of this trial remains a high-stakes issue in Delhi’s political landscape

    Jurisight

    See more from Jurisight →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer

    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse HC News

    More from this court

    • Lalu Yadav, Rabri Devi, and Tejashwi Yadav to Face Trial as Delhi Court Frames Charges in IRCTC Scam

      Delhi High Court

    • GST Notice By Registered Email Is Valid Service: Delhi HC

      Delhi High Court

    • PM CARES Fund Privacy Under RTI: Delhi High Court Explains

      Delhi High Court

    • Delhi High Court Cancels Advocate's Bail in Rape Case Involving Judicial Officers

      Delhi High Court

    Related legal topics

    • "Mockery of Justice": Delhi HC Denies Bail to Lawyer in Rape Case

      Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

    • Delhi HC Fines NGO in ₹10,000 Crore BBC Defamation Suit

      Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

    Advertisement