Skip to content

    Allahabad High Court Summons Official Over Vacant Minorities Commission Posts

    HC News

    1. Home
    2. /HC News

    Allahabad High Court Summons Official Over Vacant Minorities Commission Posts

    The Allahabad High Court has summoned the Additional Chief Secretary of the Minorities Welfare Department, Uttar Pradesh, to explain the State's continued failure to appoint the Chairman and Members of the Uttar Pradesh Commission for Minorities whose tenure ended in 2024. The bench termed the government's conduct highly disrespectful to an earlier order passed by a co-ordinate bench headed by Chief Justice Arun Bhansali on 24 April 2026.

    Jurisight Desk
    Jul 10, 2026·3 min read
    Allahabad High Court Summons Official Over Vacant Minorities Commission Posts

    This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by the Jurisight Desk.


    The Allahabad High Court on Monday issued a summons to the Additional Chief Secretary of the Minorities Welfare Department, Uttar Pradesh, directing the official to appear before the Court on 20 July 2026 to furnish a formal explanation for the State's failure to fill the vacant positions of Chairman and Members of the Uttar Pradesh Commission for Minorities. The Court observed that the previous tenure of the Commission concluded in 2024 and that no appointments have been made since then.

    The matter arises from a Public Interest Litigation filed in 2025 by Shams Tabrez, seeking directions to the respondents to take effective steps to appoint the Chairman and Members of the Commission. During the hearing on 6 July, the State Counsel informed the Court that there were only oral indications that the process of nominating the Chairman and Members was still underway. The Bench, comprising Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Manjive Shukla, took strong exception to the absence of any written instructions from the State despite the passage of time.

    Referring to an earlier order passed by a co-ordinate bench headed by Chief Justice Arun Bhansali on 24 April 2026, the Bench remarked that the State's approach was highly disrespectful to that order. In the April order, the co-ordinate bench had noted the apparent inaction of the respondents despite the fact that the tenure of the previous Commission had ended in 2024. The Bench stated that the State had been granted time in April to provide appropriate instructions regarding the present status of the proceedings, yet no written instructions had been furnished to the State Counsel.

    The Bench observed: “This is highly disrespectful of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench on 24.04.2026. Till date no written instructions have been provided what to say of nomination of Chairman and Members. This is inspite of the strong observations made in the aforesaid order.” Consequently, the Court has directed the Additional Chief Secretary to appear and explain why the nominations have not been made and why no written instructions were provided. In the event that the Additional Chief Secretary is unavailable, the Principal Secretary shall appear in his stead.

    Advertisement

    The matter has been listed for fresh hearing on 20 July 2026. Advocate Shamsher Yadav Jagrana appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The case is titled Shams Tabrez vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Minorities Welfare Deptt. Lko. and another.

    The Bench’s observations underscore the judicial expectation that State authorities comply with prior directions and maintain proper documentation when entrusted with statutory responsibilities. The summoning of a senior official reflects the Court’s insistence on accountability and adherence to procedural mandates concerning the functioning of the Minorities Commission.

    Jurisight Desk

    See more from Jurisight →
    Jurisight logoJurisight logo

    Simplifying legal knowledge for professionals and citizens. Your daily source for Supreme Court, High Court, and Business Law updates.

    Platform

    HomeAll ArticlesTop NewsSC UpdatesHC Updates

    Categories

    Business LawConstitutionalCriminal LawCivil LawKnow Your Law

    Weekly Digest

    Join 15,000+ others and get the week's most important legal updates.

    © 2026 Jurisight. All rights reserved.
    Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie ConsentLegal Disclaimer

    Explore related legal coverage

    Continue with reporting and analysis connected to this article.

    Browse HC News

    Understand the law

    • Advocates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within 2 Years Of Provisional Enrolment Cannot Continue To Practise: Allahabad High Court

      Allahabad high court

    More from this court

    • Can Higher-Mark OBC Candidates Be Excluded From PCS Mains?

      Allahabad high court

    • Landmark Decision: Allahabad HC Rules Marriage With 16-Year-Old 'Not Void' Under Muslim Law

      Allahabad high court

    • UP Panchayat Polls 2026: PIL Seeks OBC Commission

      Allahabad high court

    Related legal topics

    • SC Declines Probe into CLAT 2026 Paper Leak Allegations, Cites Delay in Filing

      Public Interest Litigation

    • Karnataka HC Dismisses PIL Against Vande Mataram School Advisory

      Public Interest Litigation

    Advertisement