Also Read - MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Three Accused of Providing Equipment for Advertising Religious Conversion

The respondent complied and filed a comprehensive supplementary affidavit furnishing area‑wise particulars based on information supplied by the Municipal Corporation itself under the RTI Act. The petitioners responded with a general reply stating that notices had been issued to the identified establishments requiring them to produce sanctioned building plans and parking plans. However, according to the respondent, the reply failed to address specifically the particulars furnished in the supplementary affidavit.

Bench’s Observations on Uniform Enforcement

A Bench comprising Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal took note of the material placed before it. The Court observed that the issues highlighted in the petition were not confined merely to the controversy between the parties but related to the uniform enforcement of municipal laws governing construction activities, sanctioned building plans, parking requirements and other statutory obligations within the municipal limits of Jammu.

Also Read - MP High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Alleged Journalist in Extortion Case

The Bench noted that the controversy had assumed dimensions extending far beyond the dispute between the parties and raised important questions regarding uniform enforcement of municipal laws governing construction activities, sanctioned building plans, parking requirements, fire safety measures and planned urban development. It referred to the supplementary affidavit which furnished area‑wise details of hotels lacking parking facilities, hotels operating without sanctioned building plans, establishments deficient in both respects and several commercial establishments where, despite alleged violations, no action had been taken by the Municipal Corporation.

The Court emphasized that municipal laws must be enforced uniformly and that allegations of selective action against one establishment while similarly situated violators continue to function unchecked raise serious concerns touching upon Article 14 of the Constitution.

Also Read - Department Of Education Cannot Impose Recruitment Restrictions On Aided Minority Schools: Delhi High Court

Operative Order to the Jammu Municipal Corporation

In light of the foregoing observations the High Court directed the Jammu Municipal Corporation to undertake a comprehensive survey of all hotels, commercial establishments, coaching institutes and other public buildings within its jurisdiction. The survey is to identify violations relating to sanctioned building plans, mandatory parking facilities, fire safety clearances and other statutory requirements.

The Court made it clear that the direction is intended to ensure that municipal authorities apply the law even‑handedly and that no establishment is subjected to action while others with comparable violations are left unchecked.

Also Read - Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Co‑operative Housing Society Managing Committee Members

Implications of the Order

The order underscores the judiciary’s role in monitoring the uniform application of municipal regulations. By directing a city‑wide survey the Court seeks to create a factual basis for assessing the extent of non‑compliance and to facilitate corrective action across the board.

The directive also reinforces the principle that selective enforcement undermines the rule of law and may constitute a violation of the equality guarantee under Article 14. Municipal bodies are now obliged to examine their enforcement practices and to take remedial steps where disparities are found.

Also Read - Patna High Court Dismisses PIL Against Award of Pirpainti Thermal Power Project to Adani Group

The matter remains pending before the High Court for further directions based on the findings of the survey ordered by the Court.